Home » Island News

This is it

Submitted by on 1, December 1, 2009 – 6:00 am2 Comments

buildingTonight’s the night, folks: The City Council is slated to decide tonight whether to give $2 million of Alameda’s $3.4 million share of Measure WW regional park bond money toward the Boys & Girls Club of Alameda’s planned West End facility.

The council had been waiting for a letter from the East Bay Regional Park District’s bond counsel saying the money can be used to help build the club’s facility. But that’s not coming until early next year.

Councilwoman Marie Gilmore asked her fellow dais-mates to make a decision anyway, saying that East Bay Parks staff have indicated the money can be used for the club. But Interim City Manager Ann Marie Gallant stopped short of recommending the funds be committed, writing in a staff report that the council should “(h)ear testimony from EBRPD representatives and take appropriate action, contingent upon receipt of bond counsel opinion as previously directed.”

Park district representatives have confirmed that they will be at tonight’s meeting, the staff report says.

Gallant had previously recommended that the council change its previously approved project list to include a request for $2 million for the club, with $1 million to be paid back over the next five years.

Club representatives had asked for the money because they’ve had a tough time raising the remaining $2 million they need for the $8 million facility they hope to build next to the Woodstock Child Development Center, and they fear they could lose some of the grant money they’ve secured if they don’t start construction before the end of the year.

Some proponents, including members of the council, have said they think the request presents an opportunity for the city to gain public access a recreational facility the city couldn’t afford to build or maintain on its own. But park and open space advocates have fought the request, saying the city has enough of its own park and open space needs and little money to meet them.


  • Barbara Thomas says:

    Does anyone besides me – consider it unusual, to say the least, that the City of Alameda and EBRPD share the same bond Counsel? Does anyone really know who they are representing when and if they render an opinion? So the City chooses to defer to EBRPD’s bond counsel (who is really our bond counsel?) Can someone tell me what this really all means?

  • David Hart says:

    Not unusual at all. Bond work is relatively small specialty area of the legal world and there are only a small number of law firms that practice it. One bond counsel can serve a large number of issues in a given locality; indeed that is the norm in many places. All bond counsel does it rule on the legality and taxability of an issue which is normally a simple cut & dried process. This one involves use of proceeds and while it is a bit stickier, it’s not all that unusual. Deferring to bond counsel is standard in such a situation.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.