Home » Island News, Schools

UPDATED School board okays LGBT lessons on 3-2 vote

Submitted by on 1, May 27, 2009 – 6:00 am6 Comments

The school board approved elementary school lessons designed to halt anti-gay bullying and harassment by a 3-2 vote on Tuesday night, capping a two-year process that one trustee said was the most divisive she’s experienced in her seven-plus years on the board.

In addition to the lessons, which would be taught starting this fall, district officials will put together a curriculum guide in an effort to prevent harassment of students based on race, religion and other factors. And Superintendent Kirsten Vital said the district will review Alameda Unified’s current anti-bullying curriculum to make sure it is meeting students’ needs.

Supporters said they’re glad that lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgendered people and their families will have the visibility they said they’ve lacked in Alameda’s public schools, while opponents said they will explore a lawsuit to halt the lessons.

“I think that my children will be very proud that their parents have a voice and that they are part of this community. And they will go to bed happy tonight,” said Sean Cahill, the parent who served on the school district committee that put the curriculum together.

Kerry Cook, a parent who opposes the lessons, said she thinks opponents of the plan were successful in getting the district to make significant revisions in the lessons. Still, she said she thinks the district was dishonest about its reasons for putting together the curriculum and that it doesn’t reflect the wishes of the majority of parents.

“We have a single-issue curriculum that advocates for one perspective on homosexuality that is not supported by the majority of Alameda,” Cook said.

Tim LeFever, who sits on the boards of two Sacramento-based groups that turned out to oppose the lessons, said they will be talking to parents about a possible lawsuit to stop them.

“Clearly, there’s precedent value in this,” he said, adding that he fears other districts could institute similar lessons.

But the Rev. Laura Rose, who serves on the Alameda C.A.R.E. committee that supports the curriculum, said she hopes to help build bridges between supporters and opponents of the lessons here on the Island.

“It’s wonderful the curriculum has been adopted. But obviously, we have a long way to go to build community in Alameda,” Rose said.

School district officials said they put the lessons together to help teachers deal with a problem they didn’t have the tools to confront, and also in an effort to increase the visibility of a group of people that they said had none in the district’s schools. They said people of other races, religions and family structures are represented in the books and lessons taught at Alameda schools.

Opponents of the lessons, who showed the board a petition they said had 468 signatures from people who don’t want them taught, said they think it’s illegal for the district to teach the lessons without allowing parents the chance to opt their children out if they don’t approve. And they threatened lawsuits and recall petitions if the board said yes.

They also said the lessons weren’t inclusive enough of other groups, and they asked the board to set up a task force to come up with lessons that more people can agree on. They said the district was failing to properly address anti-Muslim bullying and that its elementary schools lack lessons on prominent African American historical figures.

“Racial bullying is more than double that of any other group. Shouldn’t that affect your priorities?” said the Rev. Dion Evans, a parent and senior pastor of Chosen Vessels Christian Church. “If you fund this, you are proving that the Alameda Unified School District has given up on black children who are teased, bullied and marginalized beyond other groups.”

Supporters said that anti-gay bullying begins in elementary school and that the lessons are needed to combat it. They said similar lessons have been successful in other school districts. And they, too, raised the spectre of lawsuits, brought on behalf of children who are targets.

Brian Harris, a 16-year-old sophomore at Alameda Community Learning Center who is gay, said he and other gay students have faced a litany of slurs at school. He said it’s driven some students to stop trying in school and others to “just give up on life.” And he wants it to stop.

“Some members of the community have said that this curriculum is giving special rights to gays and lesbians. If this is true, should we stop teaching about civil rights, because it gives special rights to African Americans? Should we stop teaching about the Holocaust?” Harris said. “Students have a right to know that LGBT people exist, and that they are people with the same dreams and desires as everyone else.”

Trustees Tracy Jensen, Ron Mooney and Nielsen Tam voted to approve the curriculum as district officials presented it, after school board President Mike McMahon said he would vote no unless it contained an opt-out provision for the coming school year. (McMahon later said that based on the board’s vote, he would support the curriculum and would work to help implement it.)

“It’s been a long journey in regards to building an inclusive community. Apparently, we need to continue having this dialogue. But I feel we need to begin somewhere,” Tam said.

Trustee Patricia Spencer said she didn’t think the lessons were inclusive enough, and that she feared they would lead to increased bullying and harassment of students whose religious beliefs don’t square with what will be taught.

“We’ve got an achievement gap for our African American students. We’ve had African American speakers as well as those from other communities. We’ve heard we do not have curriculum that specifically goes to bullying of those protected classes. What message does that send to our African American students?” Spencer said.

Spencer and Mooney exchanged words over the impact the lessons could have on students whose religious views might not square with what’s being taught – an exchange that spilled out into the audience.

“Are we not saying to the Muslims and the Christians and the other children that come out against this is that their beliefs are wrong?” Spencer asked.

“You can have your own beliefs, but that is something that should be taught at home,” Mooney said.

“It’s the same for LGBT. It should be taught at home,” Evans, the pastor, retorted.

After the vote, Jensen offered a strongly worded statement in favor of the lessons.

“We are not telling anyone what to think. We are letting children know that gay people exist and they deserve to be treated with respect, regardless of whether or not you believe that homosexuality is acceptable,” said Jensen, who said this is the most divisive and contentious issue she’s faced in more than seven years on the school board.

More than 200 people showed up to the meeting Tuesday, prompting public safety officials to ask dozens of people to leave the overflowing council chambers at City Hall for an overflow room down the hall. More than 400 people attended the board’s public hearing on the plan two weeks ago, prompting the board to continue the hearing the following Monday in an effort to accommodate those who were turned away.

The district received e-mails from nearly 800 Alameda residents, with 375 for the lessons and 405 against. McMahon said he personally has gotten more than 1,500 e-mails on the subject.


  • Jon Spangler says:

    I deeply appreciate people who disagree with my views who are nonetheless willing to sit down and talk to me. This is a basic building block of democracy and successful local government. And sometimes emotional issues tend to weaken that willingness to stay in dialogue.

    I have been very impressed by how willing the members of Alameda CARE have been to reach out to those who have opposed the new curriculum. I hope that people who opposed the new curriculum will be willing to re-engage as fellow human beings with those of us who supported it. We need to talk to each other more, not sue each other.

    It was heartening when Pastor Dion Evans spent some 20 minutes outside City Hall following the vote, engaging in a frank and friendly conversation with members of the LGBT community. We all need more of that kind of bridge-building, not more rending of Alameda's social fabric.

  • Leslie says:

    The student in the article summed it up best: "Students have a right to know that LGBT people exist, and that they are people with the same dreams and desires as everyone else.”

    What a wonderful kid to have in our community.

    If learning about who is in a classroom is dangerous or offensive to some kids or their parents, where will those same kids live and work when they finish school? At home with their parents, the rest of their lives?

    Very thankful this curriculum is part of the over program in our schools.

  • Diana Verhalen says:

    I am so pleased that Alameda teachers and children will be given some resources to address the diversity of families that exist in our communities. The curriculum includes not just recognition of LGBT families, but grandparent-led, adoptive and other families who don’t look like the traditional nuclear family of *Leave it to Beaver*. Having just heard the stories of many LGBT high school student scholarship winners talking about the lack of support they feel even from their own families sometimes, I support this effort to make schools a safer place for everyone. May the dialogues continue, both among those who supported/opposed the curriculum and around extending the conversation to include other students/groups who continue to suffer under the lingering impact of systemic racism, male supremacy, classism, etc.

  • Stephenie says:

    I am saddened to see that we have voted in discrimination. This only addresses one type of bullying. If you are going to have lessons on this then you should have lessons on racism, weight issues, glasses, acne, etc. Kids are teased daily for any and every reason. And as a parent in the District for many years I hear the N word used 100 times more than gay as a slur. I don’t believe the parents were heard on this one. Everywhere I went prior to the vote parents would ask me so what do you think? And every one of them did not want to see this pass. I think it is very sad that we have chose to discriminate against some people’s religous beliefs. It is not right for a child to be told that what they have learned at church or with their own parents is wrong. I do believe that all bullying should stop, but realistically we know that won’t happen. But, at least be fair about it. Our children play with children who have two moms and we believe that a man and a woman should be together. But, we also don’t push our beliefs on others. So, our children are perfectly fine and well adjusted and don’t discriminate.

  • James says:

    Elementary kids are TOO YOUNG for this type of instruction.

    At the very least, they should allow parents to opt-out of this.

  • Bob says:

    Since religious freedom is both Federally protected and State protected, and AUSD opted to not allow any committee members be allowed from the religions impacted from this decision – I wonder how many people will sue the District to have AUSD pay for their kids to go to private school?
    It happens frequently for special ed kids. This opens yet another can of worms.

    The BOE certainly did not take a long look at the consequences, or their options. This was a bad way to deal with such a controversial issue at a time when the District will begin to talk about the need for more local tax dollars.

    Although the District was working on this for over two years, it is pretty clear why it was not made public until after Measure H was balloted.

    Who is going to be able to trust this Board again?

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.